Amd Rx 580 Vs Rx 570

RX 580 vs RX 570

Cost now 375$

Games supported 90%

Price now 508$

Games supported 84%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating	163	215
Value for coin	17.36	eight.73
Compages	Polaris (2016−2019)	Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code proper noun	Polaris 20	Polaris xx Ellesmere
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release engagement	18 Apr 2017 (v years agone)	eighteen April 2017 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$229	$169
Price now	$375 (1.6x MSRP)	$508 (3x MSRP)

Value for money

To become the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and heave clock speeds, manufacturing procedure, texturing and adding speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you lot have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	2048
Core clock speed	1257 MHz	1168 MHz
Boost clock speed	1340 MHz	1244 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 1000000	five,700 meg
Manufacturing process technology	fourteen nm	fourteen nm
Thermal design power (TDP)	185 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	193.0	159.2
Floating-betoken performance	vi,175 gflops	5,095 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and autobus (motherboard compatibility), additional ability connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	241 mm
Width	ii-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pivot	1x 6-pin

Memory

Parameters of retentiveness installed: its type, size, coach, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors take no dedicated VRAM and use a shared function of arrangement RAM.

Retentiveness blazon	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM corporeality	8 GB	viii GB
Retentivity bus width	256 Bit	256 Fleck
Retentiveness clock speed	8000 MHz	7000 MHz
Retentiveness bandwidth	256.0 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. Equally a rule, information in this section is precise just for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may alter the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will testify useful if you need some item engineering science for your purposes.

API support

APIs supported, including detail versions of those APIs.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	vi.iv	6.4
OpenGL	4.half-dozen	4.six
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	one.2.131	+

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark operation comparing. Annotation that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

---

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark functioning rating. Nosotros are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we commonly fix problems quickly.

• Passmark
• 3DMark Vantage Performance
• 3DMark xi Performance GPU
• 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
• 3DMark Burn Strike Score
• 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
• 3DMark Water ice Tempest GPU

This is probably the most ubiquitous criterion, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, x, eleven and 12 (the terminal being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX ten benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with ii scenes, 1 depicting a daughter escaping some militarized base of operations located within a sea cavern, the other displaying a space fleet set on on a caught planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite beingness washed in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is at present superseded past Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level x benchmark that was used for dwelling PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using stock-still resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm criterion, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. Information technology features ii separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete criterion, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to mensurate entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to brandish a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Dark Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Gaming performance

Let's come across how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Here are the average frames per second in a large fix of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	98	85
1440p	43	48
4K	36	29

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−33

21−24

Total HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	58 −6.ix%	62 +6.9%
Assassinator's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +xxx.4%	21−24 −xxx.4%
Battlefield 5	124 +twoscore.9%	88 −40.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −203%	91 +203%
Cyberpunk 2077	xxx−33 +30.4%	21−24 −30.4%
Far Weep five	83 +vii.eight%	77 −7.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	83 +9.two%	76 −9.2%
Forza Horizon 4	108 +8%	100 −8%
Hitman 3	thirty−33 +30.four%	21−24 −30.4%
Horizon Naught Dawn	30−33 +thirty.4%	21−24 −30.iv%
Cerise Dead Redemption two	30−33 +30.iv%	21−24 −30.four%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	74 +vii.2%	69 −vii.two%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +thirty.4%	21−24 −30.4%

Total HD
High Preset

Assassin'south Creed Odyssey	47 −8.v%	51 +viii.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	thirty−33 +xxx.iv%	21−24 −xxx.4%
Battlefield 5	102 +36%	75 −36%
Telephone call of Duty: Modernistic Warfare	30−33 −133%	seventy +133%
Cyberpunk 2077	xxx−33 +30.four%	21−24 −xxx.4%
Far Cry 5	76 +eight.6%	70 −8.six%
Far Cry New Dawn	78 +9.nine%	71 −ix.ix%
Forza Horizon 4	101 +vii.4%	94 −seven.four%
Hitman iii	30−33 +xxx.4%	21−24 −30.iv%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +xxx.4%	21−24 −30.iv%
Metro Exodus	48 +xi.6%	43 −11.6%
Cherry-red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +xxx.4%	21−24 −30.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	63 +6.viii%	59 −half-dozen.8%
The Witcher iii: Wild Hunt	72 −six.9%	77 +6.ix%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +thirty.4%	21−24 −xxx.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	34 +three%	33 −3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +30.4%	21−24 −30.4%
Battleground 5	93 +36.8%	68 −36.viii%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +30.iv%	21−24 −30.4%
Far Cry five	71 +nine.2%	65 −9.two%
Far Cry New Dawn	71 +7.vi%	66 −7.half dozen%
Forza Horizon 4	82 +9.3%	75 −nine.iii%
The Witcher 3: Wild Chase	44 +2.3%	43 −2.iii%
Watch Dogs: Legion	xxx−33 +thirty.four%	21−24 −30.four%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modernistic Warfare	30−33 −56.7%	47 +56.7%
Hitman 3	xxx−33 +30.four%	21−24 −thirty.iv%
Horizon Zero Dawn	thirty−33 +30.4%	21−24 −thirty.4%
Metro Exodus	28 +12%	25 −12%
Ruby Dead Redemption 2	thirty−33 +30.4%	21−24 −thirty.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	thirty−33 −23.3%	37 +23.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassinator's Creed Odyssey	thirty−33 +3.4%	29 −3.four%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	thirty−33 +xxx.4%	21−24 −xxx.iv%
Battlefield 5	30−33 −73.iii%	52 +73.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	xxx−33 +30.4%	21−24 −30.4%
Far Weep 5	30−33 −53.three%	46 +53.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	53 +10.four%	48 −10.4%
Forza Horizon four	30−33 −96.7%	59 +96.vii%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +xxx.four%	21−24 −30.iv%

4K
High Preset

Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +30.iv%	23 −30.iv%
Hitman three	30−33 +thirty.4%	21−24 −thirty.4%
Horizon Nil Dawn	30−33 +thirty.4%	21−24 −30.4%
Metro Exodus	eighteen +12.5%	sixteen −12.five%
Ruddy Dead Redemption ii	thirty−33 +30.iv%	21−24 −30.iv%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20 +v.three%	xix −five.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27 −iii.vii%	28 +iii.vii%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassinator'southward Creed Odyssey	18 +5.9%	17 −5.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +thirty.4%	21−24 −30.4%
Battlefield 5	37 +19.four%	31 −19.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	xxx−33 +30.4%	21−24 −thirty.4%
Far Weep 5	26 +8.three%	24 −8.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	29 +11.v%	26 −xi.5%
Forza Horizon four	41 +5.one%	39 −5.i%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +xxx.iv%	21−24 −30.four%

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Performance rating	30.01	23.45
Cost	$229	$169
Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	2048
Retentivity bandwidth	256	224
Thermal design ability (TDP)	185 Watt	120 Watt

Judging by the results of constructed and gaming tests, Technical Metropolis recommends

AMD Radeon RX 580

since information technology shows better functioning.

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice betwixt the reviewed GPUs, inquire them in Comments department, and we shall respond.

Cast your vote

Exercise you call up nosotros are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote past clicking "Similar" button near your favorite graphics card.

---

Competitors of Radeon RX 580 by NVIDIA

The nearest Radeon RX 580's NVIDIA equivalent is GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB, which is faster past 1% and higher by 1 position in our rating.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 580:

Competitors of Radeon RX 570 past NVIDIA

Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon RX 570 from NVIDIA is T600, which is slower by half dozen% and lower by thirteen positions in our rating.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 570:

Similar GPU comparisons

Nosotros selected several comparisons of graphics cards with operation more or less close to those reviewed, providing you lot with more options to consider.

User rating

Hither you tin can see the user rating of the graphics cards, also as rate them yourself.

---

Rate AMD Radeon RX 580 on a calibration of ane to five:

Rate AMD Radeon RX 570 on a scale of 1 to v:

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, concord or disagree with our judgements, or report an mistake or mismatch.

---

Graphics settings

Screen resolution

FPS

Source: https://technical.city/en/video/Radeon-RX-580-vs-Radeon-RX-570

Share this post